Taiwan has made remarkable achievements in construction quality as proven by the recent earthquake. Though the Mw 7.4 (MMI VIII) earthquake took 13 lives, it saved more lives if it is compared to other incidents. For instance, in Cianjur, Indonesia (2022) Mw 5.6 (MMI VIII) earthquake, the total death toll was 635. Stronger earthquake but fewer casualties. Both Taiwan and Indonesia, are near the 'Ring of Fire' and are prone to earthquakes. From an engineering perspective, at least there are three initiatives we can learn from Taiwan in protecting their people from collapsing buildings under earthquake load. Those are a strict imposition of building codes, continuous construction market improvement, and innovation.
All requirements in the Building Codes are mandatory to
obtain building approval. Furthermore, some requirements mandate some deposit of
funds into the government account. There will be consequences if the builders
or developers fail to fulfill the requirements as stated in the code. The deposited
fund will be confestigated. Therefore, any attempt to save costs should not sacrifice
the safety factors by delivering sub-standard construction material or
workmanship. This regulation becomes effective since there is effective
monitoring and a range of sanctions.
To survive in the construction market, builders and construction
industries have not only adhered to the code but also successfully improved efficiency. Through years of improvement, Taiwan’s construction industry was
found to have higher labor efficiency than mainland China. Along with the
labor, their management and technical capacities are increasing.
If the market continuously improves, it will lead to more innovative construction methodologies and technologies. To reduce the impact, we must deliver robust structures and install elements that may dampen or absorb earthquake load. These elements may be pendulums or base isolation. As installed
at the Taipei 101 skyscraper, if the building sways, the pendulum can suppress
motion by applying forces in opposite directions.
How can this be applied to housing industries in developing countries? It can be applied, but it should not jump to the innovation. It
should follow the natural law. Enforcing the code may lead to improvement in
the construction market. This means the whole ecosystem must abide by the code, i.e., homeowners, builders, construction material vendors, and government. There should be country-wide education and training for builders. Sending
engineers and skilled builders to rural areas to train local builders. Continuous
campaign on build-back-safer and seismic retrofitting. Provision of loans for house
repair and retrofitting. Along with the market improvement, there will be fair
competition to find better ways to increase safety and reduce costs through
innovation. At this point, academia should give their input that the innovation
is fulfilling the scientific aspects.
Arwin Soelaksono
No comments:
Post a Comment