Sunday, October 1, 2023

Suitable time to establish housing recovery strategy

Establishing a post-disaster housing recovery strategy should be neither too early nor too late. Too early means recovery actors develop the plan based on their organization competencies, proven to work well in the previous mission. On the other hand, if it is too late, there will be consequences such as a lack of sufficient resources, missed opportunities to collaborate with other actors and the imminent threat of inflation. We need to realize that every disaster is unique due to the magnitude of the loss and damage, the impact on people, and the socio-economic condition in the affected area.

During the earthquake assessment of damaged buildings, recovery actors should obtain sufficient information for developing the strategy. Some essential aspects we need to cover, for instance, homeowners' preferences on repairing or rebuilding their houses, their livelihood, and the local market, which can support the recovery process. The government plan for housing recovery is also crucial, but it also takes time for them to issue it.

Homeowners need time to recover from grieves and shock. Some of them even take refuge in the neighboring province. Hence, they do not know how to repair or rebuild if their livelihood is also affected. Local markets that provide builders and construction materials will need more support to fulfill the demand. The consequences are lower quality materials and services that homeowners will use, leading to a vulnerable structure. Local capacities are always the issue and need time to balance the supply and demand.

Another information needed is who other recovery actors have similar interests in the affected area. Their presence might have a positive or negative impact on the recovery program. The negative impact would be competition needing more resources in the area. Therefore, collaboration among actors should be pursued if working on a similar site can not be avoided. There are plenty of opportunities for cooperation, such as strengthening the supply chain to ensure suitable quality materials can be adequately available. Improving builders' capacities to ensure build back better. Then, advocacy to the local government and business entities to strengthen economic activities to support the housing recovery.

What then? No need for prompt planning for intervention? By no means! The team should be deployed for damage assessment and recovery strategy formulation as early as possible. It takes time to identify the cause of damage due to natural hazards such as earthquakes. Is it because of improper construction materials, building practices, or both? Finding other recovery actors or service providers that can partner in implementing the housing recovery also takes time. Because those potential partners also need time to plan and discuss with their headquarters and donors for new fruitful initiatives. For instance, from personal experience, it was a solid two months when I developed a housing recovery strategy to support 3,000 households following the 2015 Nepal earthquake. Two months after the quake, I was deployed for the damage assessment, including the beneficiaries and partner organization assessment. Comparing the S-curve developed during the strategy formulation to the actual S-curve showed that the strategy was proven suitable. Read more at https://bit.ly/3oEsLSL .

Another urgency for being on time is to ensure the most vulnerable will stay caught up. If an ordinary household can build houses in 3 months, the most vulnerable might need a year. Moreover, the most vulnerable families should be prioritized to kick start the recovery for education and capacity development of local resources.

Hence, the timing for not being in a rush or too late on developing strategy is defined by ensuring all aspects written above are covered. It should be soon after the disaster event, but it needs time for thorough planning. Not only our planning but also give time for other organizations and resources in the field to develop their plan and capacities.

 

Arwin Soelaksono

Photo:  Morocco's High Atlas Mountains. Image credit: IG @emiliemadiphotographer at https://www.instagram.com/p/CxaM68-MTSK/?igshid=NmQ4MjZlMjE5YQ%3D%3D&img_index=1  

 

No comments: